On 22/09/2018 2:30 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 09:49:07AM +1200, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 21/09/2018 1:38 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 08/09/2018 à 00:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
In some cases, when I break a line, the text to the left of the break is
shifted upwards. See the attached screenshots. In case it is difficult
to see how "abc" changes from flipping back and forth in your image
viewer, you can run the following command:

     compare -compose difference 1of2_before_jump.png 2of2_after_jump.png 
diff.png

Would it be a valid feature request to not have the upward shift of
"abc" in this situation, or is the "jump" actually desired? If it would
be a valid feature request, I would not expect this issue to be high
priority.
I tried briefly and cannot reproduce. I cannot tell where this comes from,
unfortunately.
Thanks for trying. Interesting. Perhaps it could be a Qt difference
then. I'm on Qt 5.9.5.

Can anyone else reproduce?

Scott
Yes (windows 7, Qt 5.10.1), but this seems logical to me. Surely the
movement of the "abc" in your examples is to accommodate/release the extra
vertical space needed by the note inset? Without the inset there is no
movement.
Thanks for reproducing, Enrico and Andrew. I think your diagnoses are
correct. And although I don't like the shifting, I can't think of a way
around it.

Scott
But line movement and the separation of lines when a text sub-/superscript is inserted does seem excessive, as does the separation of the script from the character it is attached to. The result on screen is ugly and suggests an effect in the pdf that doesn't occur.

Andrew

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Reply via email to