On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 09:32:49PM -1000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 04/11/2018 à 11:16, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > I see, sounds tricky. Perhaps we should leave things untouched? Would it > > be complicated to allow for the multi-cell inset to decide what the > > behavior is? I'm guessing this would be too complicated and is not the > > best use of your time, but in case I'm wrong, if you implement the > > general framework, I could take care of auditing all of the individual > > insets and also poll lyx-users to see what is the most natural to all. > > Please try the attached and tell me if you like it.
For me it doesn't make much of a difference for the use case I mentioned. I now get the attached screenshot with those steps. Either with this patch or without this patch, I need to click (or move with cursor) on the box above "=" to enter "def" to get my desired output. > I think personally that it makes sense. I trust whatever you think is best. I know nothing about the inner workings of this. Thanks for your work on it. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
