On 02-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yes... but putting this in now just makes the transformation to a
> std::list harder.
I didn't say we should put in this feature now I just outlined a possible
solution with the actual pargraph structure.
>| This seems simple to me (and it doesn't use up a lot of memory)!
> ?? As opposed to what?
To a new structure where we have all in a vector? I don't know and maybe
I'm completely wrong, I just wanted to see a possible solution for this
problem when we use a vector. It's just some feeling about going down a
way which gives us more memory usage as we already have and I feel really
bad about the great memory usage we have now for tabulars, but I don't have
any idea about how we could reduce it :(
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
One can't proceed from the informal to the formal by formal means.
