Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 04-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > lyxstring is a hack.
|
| But a good and necessary hack, isn't it ;)
but not for long... imo we should never choose lyxstring over a
conforming std::string.
lyxstring has certainly served its purpose, but its time is running
out.
--
Lgb
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Dekel Tsur
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Allan Rae
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Allan Rae
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Juergen Vigna
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Size of 1.2.0cvs? Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
