On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:13:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 05/10/2020 à 17:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > After thinking about it more though, I agree that the new version seems > > to be better in terms of having only one return, although it's > > interesting that some minor complexity (e.g., the cast or the explicit > > comparison to nullptr) has to be added to achieve this in some cases. > > The comparison to nullptr is not needed afaik. It just makes more sense. One > knows that if() requires a boolean in general, but in the case of a return > statement, having to check return type makes things a bit too difficult IMO.
I see, makes sense. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
