On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 08.01.2021 um 20:32 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > It would be nice to get someone else's feedback (Jürgen?) before you > > work on it. I see a few possibilities: > > > > 1. A tag that does not allow layouts to nest other layouts of the > > same > > type. > > > > 2. A tag that does not allow a layout to be nested at all. > > > > 3. A tag that is similar to the "AutoNests" tag, where we can list > > all > > of the layouts that a layout should not nest (or should not be > > nested by?). > > > > (3) is the most general so my initial guess is that's the way to go. > > I > > like your name for the tag that you proposed earlier, > > ProhibitNesting. > > NeverNestedBy with "none" indicating a layout cannot be nested at all? > The analog function is AutoNestedBy (not AutoNests), and I suppose most > of the code can just be copied.
That name is fine with me. I think I slightly prefer the sound of "ProhibitNestingBy". I guess "NeverNestedBy" is more a property of the underlying LaTeX mechanism (e.g., "a section is never nested in another section") and "ProhibitNestingBy" is more a property of LyX's layout feature (e.g., "LyX will prohibit the user from nesting a section in another section"). I'm not familiar with the layout code, so whatever you and Riki think is more consistent is fine with me. Also, it takes me a little while to parse "never nested by none", but would it make more sense for "never nested by *all*" to mean a layout that cannot be nested at all? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
