On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 10:38:13AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 11:15:53PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:53:38AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > If you agree with this proposal, I can ask on lyx-users. If > > > you disagree, let's continue discussion and hopefully someone else has > > > an opinion. > > > > I am completely fine with your proposal, please ask on user list. > > If no one is interested we can just leave it with existing LFUN > > and note in documentation... > > Sounds good. I sent the email.
So what is your reading of the results? Seems to me no interest. As a result I would favor committing my patch minus context menu UI plus any changes you might have for the wording. And I'll add some note into manuals. > JMarc came up with a solution that I think might actually be closer to > what you want, in the sense that you could open all insets of all > activated branch insets, and close all insets of all deactivated branch > insets. The other exchange with JMarc seem to go different direction if I understand it right... Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
