Am Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:56:41 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>:
> Am Wed, 1 Jun 2022 08:01:19 -0400
> schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:59:47AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Tue, 31 May 2022 12:20:55 +0200
> > > schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>:
> > >
> > > > At least here is what I can see:
> > > >
> > > > $ wc styFiles.lst
> > > > 11429 11429 812660 styFiles.lst
> > > > $ sort styFiles.lst | uniq| wc
> > > > 5943 5943 422983
> > > >
> > > > Kornel
> > >
> > > Attached patch fixes it. OK to commit?
> >
> > I checked and I have duplicates also. Thanks for fixing this!
> >
> > The patch looks good to me, +1 to commit. Here are some comments that
> > after thinking more I'm guessing you should _not_ incorporate:
> >
> > I was wondering whether a set would be more appropriate than a
> > dictionary since the "1" seems irrelevant from what I can see. But after
> > some searching I did not find any performance advantage of using a set.
> > And dictionaries are more common, so I think your patch is good.
> >
> > One other minor comment is I wonder if preallocating the dictionary
> > could speed things up a bit? But then I realized that the script speed
> > is probably dominatinated by something else (I/O?), so probably better
> > to avoid complication for something that doesn't have a non-trivial
> > impact on speed.
> >
> > Scott
>
> Thanks Scott. I was hoping someone has a better idea. In fact, there is.
> Simply move
> visited = set()
> to outside of the 'for'-loop.
> The resulting output is the same as with my previous patch.
>
> Kornel
>
Committed at a379c5d5
Kornel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
pgpeY4_xnCgx_.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
