On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:37:18PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > Well, if barely anyone tests with Qt 4 (I'm only using Qt 5.15), it's > already unsupported in practice and making the necessary changes would be > (1) cumbersome and (2) a waste of resources (little gain in supporting > versions of software that only belongs to a museum -- it's not as old as 486 > <https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-i486-Linux-Possible-Drop>, though).
Thanks, Thibaut. Does anyone object then to supporting only Qt5 for 2.4.0 (and forward)? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
