On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 17:29, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 06:55:11AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Wed, 11 Jan 2023 01:12:40 +0100 > > schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier <dourou...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Still > > > > Error: Bad value "content-type" for attribute "http-equiv" > on element "meta". > > > > > > > > Should we ignore this error? > > > > > > > I don't think we should ignore it. It really seems to be > platform-dependent (either due > > > to LyX or the HTML validator). I really can't reproduce locally, even > when running the > > > test through CTest (log attached for Intro.lyx). However, when > uploading my file to > > > https://validator.nu/#file, I get the error message. > > > > I suppose the call to validate is still commented out in your > export.cmake? > > I have now enabled the call at 88087a3c, now that the test passes here > too. Thanks for > > your work. > > Thanks to both of you on making progress on these tests. Still a lot of > tests fail for me. Is it OK to comment out the check_xhtml_validate() > line until the tests are passing for all of us? Otherwise it's hard for > me to figure out which failures are due to regressions. > It's totally OK: I won't have time to work on all these issues in time for LyX 2.4. Some of them are rather deep (like <div> being generated at the wrong place).
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
