Am 02.03.2023 um 15:57 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[email protected]>: > > Le 20/02/2023 à 17:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> Le 13/02/2023 à 21:29, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >>>>> Indeed! So we should get rid of QRegexp now. >>>> >>>> Riki, would that be OK? What I have in mind is that whatever bug with this >>>> newer code will be found earlier if more users are running it. >>> >>> Yes, fine with me. >>> >>> I have been waiting to talk about next steps until we have some idea what >>> to do about the shortcut problem on OSX. That seems a large issue. >> This patch removes all traces of QRegExp. It will obviously need testing, >> but this is already the code used with Qt6. > > Riki, is this OK to apply? > >> What I do not know is whether we can get rid of QtCore5Compat library. Is it >> useful for anything beyond QRegExp? > > Enrico, Stephan Kornel, do you know something about needing QCore5Compat?
ATM, Qt6 is unusable on Mac because of bug 12641. :( OTOH, Scott and Kornel mentioned QTextCodec already. So, there is some work to do. Stephan -- lyx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
