Am Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:30:53 +0200 schrieb Cor Blom <corneli...@gmail.com>:
> Op 06-10-2023 om 12:14 schreef Kornel Benko:
> > Am Fri, 06 Oct 2023 10:53:25 +0100
> > schrieb José Matos <jaoma...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2023-10-06 at 11:09 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >>> Should we rename this file on install to be able to install multiple
> >>> lyx-versions?
> >>> Like "org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml" -> "LyX2.4.metainfo.xml"
> >>> if using versioned suffixes?
> >>>
> >>> Kornel
> >>
> >> Using my blue hat here (Fedora). :-)
> >>
> >> Although I am not using cmake (yet!) I prefer to have the simple
> >> version. When I need to take care of another version I prefer to do it
> >> myself.
> >>
> >> Looking into the system directory (/usr/share/metainfo/) I do not see
> >> any versioned file.
> >>
> >> My two ¢.
> >
> > I am using lyx2.3 and lyx2.4 in parallel installed. The problem will arise
> > on
> > installing lyx2.5 later.
> >
> > Installing without using the suffix should be no problem for you (e.g. no
> > change)
> > My proposal would rename it to "LyX.metainfo.xml".
> >
>
> This conflict is, I believe, also present in autoconf builds. The
> default there is to build without suffix. If I move to cmake for
> openSUSE packages, it's very likely I will continue to build without suffix.
>
> Cor
>
Sure, good for you. But not for my use case.
Kornel
pgpIySxJJXfN1.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
