> 2026/08/04 21:18、Koji Yokota <[email protected]>のメール:
>
>> 2026/08/04 20:17、Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]>のメール:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 10:12:14AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>>>
>>> I get now the following test-errors (see attached)
>>
>> I have the same as Kornel. Koji, can you reproduce? To reproduce
>> manually, export to 2.4.x, then open that exported file and try default
>> compilation.
>
>>
>> The situation is better now though, at least the default compilation
>> works and indeed we don't need to explicitly set the fonts. That is
>> nice. It seems there is only now a lyx2lyx issue. Can you take a look at
>> the lyx2lyx issue?
>>
>> If the lyx2lyx issue is complicated to solve, and you recommend to leave
>> things as they are, that's fine. Kornel and I just need to know if we
>> should now expect these failures and adapt the tests accordingly.
>
>
> Thanks, I’ll report it soon. I had been struggling with investigating how
> ‘test’ works X<
>
> Since the remaining change of the document is basically the move from pLaTeX
> to luaLaTeX, I suspect it is related to the timing when the used layout is
> introduced to LyX.
There seems a switch of document language when the Japanese LuaLaTeX document
is exported to 2.4. In the LyX 2.4 file, document language changes to English
and it is switched to Japanese using ERT "\resetdefaultlanguage{japanese}” and
"\setotherlanguage{japanese}” in the preamble.
Also, even though both LyX has the default setting in
Document->Settings->Language->Language Package, only LyX 2.4 document contains
a line "\usepackage{polyglossia}”.
They result in the polyglossia error:
Package polyglossia Error: The current main roman font, lmroman10-regular,
(polyglossia) does not contain the "CJK" script!
(polyglossia) Please define \cjkfont with \newfontfamily
(polyglossia) command
Koji--
lyx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
