Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | So what are people supposed not for their LaTeX bits in math e.g.?
| > |
| > | It currently displays as "math text" which is not exactly what people are
| > | used to...
| >
| > all text in 'tex-mode' should be in an inset. For all other places
| > than mathed this is '666', do mathed need a new mathinset to
| > accommodate this?
|
| >From what I understand, until now tex-mode in mathed only was some kind of
| 'Character layout' that was used to
| a) display the stuff in red and
| b) to prepend a backslash when exporting to LaTeX.
|
| I think this could be realized by an extra inset (maybe it even should - I
| have not thought about it yet).
|
| Otoh I did not really expect to get Flak from this side...
It is possible that I have commented out too much 'tex-mode' stuff,
and that the implementation in mathed really is ortogonal with the
regular tex-mode.
| Would it be too hard to leave the tex-mode stuff in mathed until I made my
| mind up? I don't know what it did in the outside world, but I live under
| the impression that mathed's 'tex-mode' does not really interfere with ERT
| outside math...
_if_ mathed tex-mode uses the lyxfont::latex then it must go at once.
It mathed tex-mode is _not_ using it, it can be allowed back in.
Can you snoop around and see what the state is?
--
Lgb
