> Dekel> Or \limits after \sin
>
> \sin is a \mathop, right?
>
> Dekel> And note that currently a subscript after \underbrace is
> Dekel> rendered incorrectly.
>
> In fact, \underbrace is a \mathop too. Mathed should know about which
> insets/entities are mathops.
Does this mean we basically have two things:
- "ordinary" scriptinsets that appear after say 'a' or nothing
that don't have \limit/\nolimit
- mathops (\sum, \sin, \underbrace...) that can have su*scripts
that could have \limit etc...
?
If so, it would sound reasonable two implement thes two classes as seperate
insets (that may share some code, but...)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz ............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
