On 17-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Well what we could do is put the cursor ALWAYS after the inset when it
>> returns finished and check for LFUNS which put it before the inset, maybe
>> this decicion is easier for you.
>
> That's is a hack as well. It would help, of course....
Well you're are right. Maybe we should really split the return-code to
FINISHED and FINISHED_BEHIND. Would that seem better to you?
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Mencken and Nathan's Second Law of The Average American:
All the postmasters in small towns read all the postcards.
