Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 12:08:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > For users
> >
> > Users should use the lyx math-macro mechanism
>
> Users use third-party .sty files all the time. It's not uncommon to
> co-operate with people who do not use LyX.
>
> > >, and packages, which define new macros which LyX hasn't
> > > heard of. It's just a more flexible approach..
> >
> > Can you give an example of such a package ?
> > And how this approach should work on macros with arguments ?
>
> 1. It should not. We are talking about "symbols" (whatever that is...)
symbols:
- so-called latex-symbols:
- we have symbols without any package
- with package latexsym
- amsmath symbols
- lots of other packages with special symbols,
like wasysym, marvosym a.s.o.
it makes sense to support the latex and amsmath one, but the
other ones .... ???
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
