On Wednesday 09 January 2002 2:10 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:51:17PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 12:46:45PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > It works fine here with one problem I think. It appears that I can
insert a
> > > math-inset within a math-inset. This shouldn't be allowed, should it?
> >
> > It should at some point of time. Think of math in \mbox...
> > Maybe the mbox stuff has opened a hole already that should not be open
> > yet...
> >
> > > Should I apply all this now, or would people prefer to play with it a
little
> > > first.
> >
> > It looks ok, seems to work, so I'd say 'do what you want as long as Martin
> > promises to clean up any resulting mess' ;-)
> >
> > Andre'
>
> Perhaps I should go on a long holiday now :-)
>
> No, I think I can handle it. It works for me including (with the stuff I
sent
> you André) font changes on selections in mathed. Otherwise this seems safe
> as it only adds a GUI to functionality that's already there. Worst case is
> that it doesn't work. (And I don't promise to write the GTK/Qt version!)
Ok, I'll shove it in after I've recompiled with the latest updates.
Incidentally, in the ChangeLog part of your diff was this:
2002-01-09 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* insettabular.C:
* insettext.C:
Fix for bug #59:
Insert a (math) inset into a table cell. Then, move the cursor
along the current row. The lines at the bottom of other cells
are erased (on screen).
The insettext.C fix eliminates bug illustrated by attachment 37.
Should I just bin that, or shove it in the insets/ChangeLog?
Regards,
Angus
