Is there an example file for this so it's a bit easier for the rest of us to find out where "down there" is?
Andr� quoted as saying: The proper fix would be not to expand the "nested" macro, but we don't have the information which macro already has been expanded once we are "down there". Wouldn't a simple fix for now be to not expand the macro if it is recursive? Since you would be "up there" and could see that you were self-referencial. Allan. (ARRae)
