On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
> A double-open bug was reproted, you claim that the patch you checked
> in should fix this, and I wonder it got fixed for the original
> reporter as well.
Apologies for the confusion. I hoped the "btw...@ would indicate my
ambivalence as to whether the original patch (or others) had caused the
problem (which I opened in bugzilla).
I suppose I am a sucky QA :)
john
--
"So what you're saying is "screw the disabled" and you want us to do the
same ? No thanks..."
- Ian Hixie, bug 25537
