>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Could you elaborate this? I think we CAN have this in lyx (at Juergen> least starting from the version we support with 1.2.0). Why Juergen> should 1 additional file give any more problems? It's Juergen> isolated and if you don't want you don't have too look inside Juergen> it, we just say if we don't support this file-version anymore Juergen> then call this function and it should handle it as it thinks Juergen> it should do it! Juergen> If you don't want to work on it noone is forcing you, but IMO Juergen> it is the best thing to do and mybe we can extend the Juergen> compatibility read also for older files. We don't need any Juergen> external application it's one file module and I don't think Juergen> it will neighter add a lot more bytes to the lyx executable Juergen> nor give you any more thing to think of! And this is "really" Juergen> user friendly! I do not know what the plans are for the lyx meeting, but it would be great if at least a prototype of backawards compatibility code (either external script or internal code) is created. The more we wait the more difficult it will be... JMarc
