Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | Despite that, it seems to be more and more necessary for LyX
>> | developers _and users_ to be using gcc-cvs rather than
>> | gcc-some-recent-release if they want to compile LyX!
>>
>> Bullshit!
>>
>> Please try to backup that claim.
>
| You said yourself in an earlier email how 3.1 is the compiler we
| should be using. And how 3.2 will have some wonderful new template
| code that reduces overhead by a factor of 5. Likewise, you are also
| claiming that the only compilers worth using with exceptions is gcc >
| 3.0. You are similarly calling 2.96 a non-compiler or at least a
| compiler everyone should avoid.
Please go back and reread my messages... it sees that you only glanced
at them the first time.
--
Lgb
