On Tuesday 25 June 2002 9:45 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Jost Martin wrote: > > This all didn't change anything. So now I'm at the end of my wits... > > The usual answer is "Don't mix gcc with 'native' binutils". > > Can't you just use the native compiler if you insist on the native linker? > > Andre'
More specifically, this seems to occur only with gcc 2.95.2. gcc 2.95.4 is Ok. No, we don't understand what's gone wrong! Angus
