Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>What I mean is that there are AFAIK different design choices in normal
>>and math insets. And then there is the problem of the quality of the
>>existing implementations. These are two different things, although
>>both are very important in practice.
>
>
> The main problem is that both approaches are not really compatible.
> Of course, we have it working _somehow_, but the interface is far from
> nice...
Agreed!
>>Basically I see that Andre' says math insets are better, Juergen says
>>the opposite. They are the ones who know about it.
>
> ... and the second problem is that neither of us knows both sides well.
Agreed!
>>And then, why am I supposed to say sound things?
>
> Because usually nobody else does.
The only right answer, Andre #:O)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kravoglstrasse 4 Tel/Fax: +39 0471 564172 - +39 0471 564122
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.lyx.org/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
