On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > | The only disadvantage I see is that we'll have 100+ additional member > | functions in the base class (which is certainly not Nice), but the total > | effort should be about the same. > > Do we really want any of those approces?
Well, at least we have one of them right now. > Wouldn't a system where the "insets" register LFUNS with the > dispatcher (which we would only need one of) be better? Would be nice for "plugins", wouldnt' it? But that does not solve my current problem of having to call a base class' handlers manually in a derived class as far as I can see. Or does it? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
