On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:41:22AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >freezeUndo()
> >{
> > if (++undo_frozen_count == 1)
> > undo_frozen = true;
> >}
> >
> >unfreezeUndo()
> >}{
> > if (--undo_frozen_count == 0)
> > undo_frozen = false;
> >}
> >
>
> IMO this counting is error prone.
Yes, it catches errors ;)
> Anyway we could just put the whole
> stuff into a class with private static members (does this exist?) and
> instead of using the external bool use a function, but at the end IMO
> it's just the same.
Well the above removes a global bool with no other changes ...
regards
john
--
"When your name is Winner, that's it. You don't need a nickname."
- Loser Lane
