On 23 Oct 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> IMHO the only benefit with lyxstring now is that it makes lyx > Lars> compile on some os where it would otherwise get linking errors. > > A datapoint with 1.2.2cvs (I know this is not what you want, but it is > what I have here). The main point is that I have gcc 2.95.2, which > makes quite a difference. We could say ``why bother with it'', but it > is what I have. > > basic_string: > > real 13m52.380s > user 12m17.310s > sys 1m11.700s > > schuss: du -s . > 301104 .
gcc-2.95.3 + 1.3.0cvs + build in source tree so subtract about 35MB for sources du -s lyx-devel/ 600448 lyx-devel size src/lyx text data bss dec hex filename 5115847 1227720 52068 6395635 6196f3 src/lyx du -s src/lyx 122404 src/lyx This is not trivial. It also takes forever on a PIII-450 (with 384MB so there's minimal swapping). > lyxstring > > real 10m24.573s > user 8m53.160s > sys 1m5.320s > > schuss: du -s . > 182660 . > > The difference in size is no negligible... I'll see about trying out Lars' patch. For the record 1.2.2cvs takes 21m30s to compile on this box with lyxstring and with no other load. Allan. (ARRae)
