On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:25:17PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote: > > I don't think it is too much work, but there are a few political brakes. > > One camp does not want too tight .tex integration in the core (and rather > > spend the same amount of code on parsing .lyx syntax), the next one thinks > > reLyX is cute (especially if nobody understands it), the third one does not > > want to break anything that happens to work (somehow, for a few people) and > > the fourth camp likes to completely stall work for three months twice a > > year... > > Well, I personally would like .tex integration in the core, but writing > new code in C++ does not imply that it be inside the kernel. One can have > a separate executable even named reLyX if one think it is cute.
One could. But in fact half or so of the math parser is the part that stuffs LyX internal stuctures, so this part has to be "in" anyway. Building a separate binary out of the second 700 lines does not make too much sense imo - at least not in the beginning. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
