Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
| Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
| Angus> out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former because it's really old and
| Angus> doesn't have image support. The latter because there is no
| Angus> clean separation between 0.88 and 0.89. The functionality comes
| Angus> with 0.89.5. It seems ridiculous to have to justifying that to
| Angus> a user of 0.89.2 for which no other 0.89 binary was released.
>
| I think we should support xforms 0.89.6 and 1.0. And maybe 0.89.5 if
| it costs nothing. Older 0.89.x are indeed out of question.
This solution is also what I will be most comfortable with, even if it
is not really what I would like to do.
Let's decide upon this.
(what are the differences between 0.89.5 and 0.89.6?)
--
Lgb
