On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 07:55:32PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > Blah blah blah.| > > Blah Blah Blah. > > What's the blah? I like much more say option 2 than the current situation. > There are situations in which putting an empty par are handy. For instance > for remembering that you have to enter text there. Why to forbid it > completely? Getting sure that the user knows that it's wrong it's enough.
Because your solutions are really awkward otherwise, if we allow it "a bit". The user won't know what hit them if their empty pars have some mark around them. > > The only way you could get this to work is only allow a paragraph split, > > ie you have to enter some text before you get to press return, and you > > have to have some in front and behind. I wonder what that would feel > > like. I wonder if it would be possible to maintain the no-empty-pars > > Well, that was exactly what I have said: (go to where you want to put the > new par, then...) type the paragraph, then enter. Guess so > > I don't think anybody would grieve for the loss of DEPM, as initiates > > into its ways know it. I would say: GO FOR IT. I bet it's not even > > mega-hard ! > > I think it's much simpler to implement (and get right) than the current > solution. I bet. john
