Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bj�nnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On 11 Mar 2003, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
| Lars> |
| Lars> | > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | > | Why? "lyx -client <cmd> <args>" is nice too. It has to
| Lars> share code with | > | lyx (read prefs, for example) anyway.
| Lars> | >
| Lars> | > No, it doesn't have to do that.
| Lars> |
| Lars> | How can I know where are lyxpipes?
|
| Lars> We should remove the config options of being able to set the
| Lars> pipe names. Then the pipes can always be found in the same spot.
|
| OK, I am running under afs, so I cannot create a pipe in my home dir.
| Am I also in the family of people we do not want to support?
Then perhaps we should create our pipes and sockets in a different
places as standard. (/tmp/)
I'd also like to know what other applications that has a similar
facility does. Or are they just not working on afs?
| Also when you say that only people using .lyx as user directory should
| be supported, how about people who want to have both 1.2.x and 1.3.x
| installed? Are they also people we do not want to support?
| Why don't you tell us why adding to client capability to lyx itself is
| such a bad idea?
- bloat (sounds strange comming from me doesn't it?)
- server/client separation
I might be swayed, but then the whole client handling in lyx needs to
be moved our into its own "subsystem".
--
Lgb
