Jose' Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 13:30, Angus Leeming wrote: >> I'm thinking of killing it. >> >> It's a nice idea (allows you to tune the variables passed to the >> conversion command) but actually there should be one for each output >> format. So the implementation is clunky. Moreover, it doesn't sit well >> with the converter mechanism. No other converters have this "per command" >> tunability. > >> Shall I do it? > > IMHO yes, if later we get this feature it will be general and not > especific > of inset external. > As usual I would advice to you to ask in the users list if someone is > using > it. I would no expect it, and I expect the converter scheme to be enough > for most (all?) cases. > > But this is just my opinion. :-)
That's what I asked for. Thank you. I'll post the message to the users' list. -- Angus
