John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:21:14PM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: | | > // A 'paste' operation creates a new inset with the correct filepath, | > // but then the 'old' inset stored in the 'copy' operation is actually | > // added to the buffer. | | I don't see how this can happen. We clone the inset used in cut_clone.
Note that some of the implementation changed as part of the
CutAndPaste work some weeks ago.
--
Lgb
