On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:42:07AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > A proposal: how about making the draws step order explicit? I mean to keep > the 'current step' in some variable and abort (or complain) if a given > operation is not allowed on this step (like getting the cursor row or y > position before a needed rebreak). It would certainly make debugging easier > IMHO, and maybe not too invasive if we add the checks on a lower enough > level. Do you think it would be feasible/useful?
I think it is a good idea. But I'd guess we'd get lots of 'illegal' accesses as long as 'update' is still present, so I am not sure it will help much at the beginning. To iron out the last wrinkles after 'update' is gone, it just looks fine, though. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
