Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I don't understand what's happening. Shouldn't row.endpos() be > | par->size() if the par is small enough? Someone can explain to the > | thicko here? > > and why not par->size() - 1?
Well, it's used like a past-the-end position (and again, par->size() - 1 would have the problem of the -1 on empty paragraphs). Right now is par->size() + 1 that doesn't make any sense to me! Alfredo
