Andre Poenitz wrote: > > This is just for the record: > > The attached patch is a long shot at getting rid of inset locking. > > <stifflip mode="british understatement"> > Slightly off the mark, though. > </stifflip> > > It should apply against last Thursday's CVS but is full of conflicts > now. I won't bother updating it as it completely breaks anything > releated to mouseclicks (positioning and selection) in nested insets. > > However, it should convey a rough idea of what needs to be done and > what can be gained...
I think that this will be pretty cool once it's in. For going small steps, I think that the recently introduced ParIterator::lockPath could be useful, as it allows both schemes to coexist. Seems to work pretty well (tested on the search/replace/change tracking code). What do you think? Alfredo
