Andre Poenitz wrote: >> Compiling. Note that we should anyway assert on "no rows", be cause "no >> rows" means "no position information at all" so the checkInsetHit call >> would be completely bogus. > > No, it means 'no _internal_ position information'.
... what about the inset size? Height in particular. > The xy placement of the inset and its dimension are valid after the > first draw (the dimension even already after the first metrics). The first metrics then imply knowing the rowbreaking (otherwise how would it know its height?) > This is sufficient for 'inset hit'. ... > But I just noticed we need to a bit more careful: If an inset is not > visible anymore (because the user scrolled down) it keeps its xy chace > with bogus values... Ugh... Alfredo
