On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:38:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> | Mainly because this levels the ground for 'dynamic insets' with > >> | auto-registration on startup and all these fancy things. > >> > >> I have no idea what a "dynamic inset" is. > > > | Think plugin. > > inset-insert-pluginfoo still works...
but LFUN_INSERT_PLUGIN_FOO will not as this is set at compile time. > | duplicate the code'. The code that's already there seems to support the > | 'single lfun' approach, so this recommendation is actually supporting > | your approach... > > And it is not hard to combine the handling of very similar lfuns > further back in the processing. Yes, but it is not possible to create new lfuns at run tim right now.. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
