Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> This is true. >> I was a bit reluctant because I was thinking some awful table behaviour >> I've suffered: if the mouse goes out, the selection jumps to a higher >> level, > > That's what math does.. > >> but there's no going back, so you are normally stuck with a >> selection bigger than what you want. Mathed behaviour is nice (I ... but this was the awful part... >> didn't noticed ;-), because it allows going back. ... that mathed doesn't have. > And I think the math selection scheme is even simpler than the one used > outside (just cursor + selection anchor, instead of cursor + selection > beging + selection end), but I fear we'd break too much if we touched > 'outer world selection' right now. (Gee, at what time did I fall into > the 'careful' camp?) :-) I don't want to play with selection anyway for the moment. Alfredo
