On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:38:01PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > > > Btw, I always found it a bit stange to have both (e.g.) 'word-left' > > > > > and 'word-left-select' as separate LFUNs. Some 'selection-on, word-left' > > > > > combo should have done as well... > > > > > > > > It saves some typing in command sequences. > > I am more concerned about implementation. Not having a 'native' > LFUN_WORD_LEFT_SELECT does not mean we can't have an > 'word-left-select' 'alias'. > I was actually trying to agree with you... ;-)
/Christian -- Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
