Jose' Matos wrote: > Suppose you later change the implementation and not the interface. That > is > not possible with a public data member.
Possibly, but you still have limitations (return a reference). In that case I would expect an "int foo()" and an "void foo(int)" accessors. > And don't tell me we don't ue to change the implementation details, I > would laugh in your face. (Finally an oportunity to throw a white glove on > a friday). <flame deflector> Oh, the policy seems to be to never change implementation details, just the interface. Alfredo PS: I won't close the tag.
