>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> What would be wrong with setting the execute bit properly? We do >> that for lyx2lyx, don't we? Angus> Nothing is wrong with doing that. If we set the executable bit, Angus> then the code in LyX itself requires a trivial change: This looks good. Remember that you should set the executable bit before adding the file to cvs. Or we should make sure that the executable bit is set at install time. Does automake do that for us? Angus> So the question now becomes, should we use just one script Angus> (lyxpreview2ppm.py) for all users or should we continue to use Angus> the proven lyxpreview2bitmap.sh for non-Windows users? How confident are you that it works? Are there differences in what they do, or are they equivalent? JMarc
