>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> So, now you can access a list of all bindings associated with a Angus> FuncRequest: Yes. Angus> and you would like to generate a QString for each kb_sequence Angus> in this list. To do so, you need access to 'sequence' and the Angus> 'first ' part of 'modifiers', below: Yes. Angus> Have I got this right? Indeed. Angus> Assuming that I have, why not add two functions to kb_sequence, Angus> as below. That would be guaranteed safe as everything is Angus> const... I think this is just a band-aid... a kb_sequence should probably be a container of LyXKeySym, and a LyXKeySym should contain the modifiers along with it. However, I do not think that now is the time for such changes. My current thinking is that, if we are going to add kludgy code, I'd rather stick to my original code which at least does not pretend to clean up anything... JMarc
