Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> I have to admit that the length of this patch makes me nervous. >>> Isn't it possible to devise a `just good enough' solution that >>> could go in 1.3.6? > > Angus> Sure. Describe what you would like to see. > > I do not know precisely... Could we get away without the nifty > validators, so that the result is not as good as 1.4.x, but better > than 1.3.5?
In that case, we should leave the code almost as it is now, but make the loop in the browser code understand \tex_allows_spaces. -- Angus
