Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | (See attached.) I can't remember if any concensus was reached. The
>> code is
>> | certainly conceptually cleaner than what we have now, even if it
>> | transpires that it doesn't actually reduce traffic that much.
>> | If nodody says "commit it, Angus", I'll just leave it to rot in my
>> pending
>> | directory.
>> I like it.
>> But the patch would have been easier to read with "-Bbw" and without
>> the non-ws reformatting...
>
| So, my .cvsrc should read
>
| $ cat .cvsrc
| update -dP
| diff -upNBbw
| rdiff -upNBbw
>
| ?
Nah... add -Bbw on a case-by-case basis. Often you don't want it...
and I am unsure whether a patch generated with it will apply...
But in some cases it surely makes the patch a lot easier to read.
--
Lgb
