On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:31:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Hmmm. Does the code now assume implicitly that the data is stored > | contiguously? > > I do not think that we do.. and if we do that should be changed.
We do not rely on 'contigously' but on reasonably fast random access. > I think a log of dependencies on [] has crept, so changing to > std::list might be simple... but with a semi huge patch. We are still discussing the problem of slow erase() in ParagraphList? This can be solved without switching to std::list. Andre'
