Martin Vermeer wrote: > Yes, you're right. But this patch didn't touch that (has is been > broken?)
Yes, it has been broken. I should have made clearer that I do not blame your patch for it, I just noticed it again. Jürgen
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Yes, you're right. But this patch didn't touch that (has is been > broken?)
Yes, it has been broken. I should have made clearer that I do not blame your patch for it, I just noticed it again. Jürgen