Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2006 16:39 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > | Jean-Marc, we could of course also combine both patches and use the > | <default> layout that you proposed. That would be 2026-6.diff. > > I do not agree with that as the final solution.... > > Why require a special name?
I was Jean-Marcs idea. For me, "Standard" would also be OK (although a special name is a bit more expressive, and one could theoretically have a non-default layout named "Standard". > It will need a more logical name anyway so > something similar to \default_layout will be needed. I guess you mean \begin_layout \default_layout ? I just tried, this works fine, simply replace <default> with \default_layout in the patch. Does that mean that 2026-6.diff with \default_layout instead of <default> is OK with you? Georg
