Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I noticed today that bibtex-supported citations do not work (giving
| [?]) when doing the first View>DVI. The reason is simple: LyX runs
| latex, then bibtex, then latex again. Therefore, since bibliography is
| at the end of the document, the \cite macros do not see the correct
| values from BibTeX's .bbl file.
|
| A natural way of doing this would be to see whether the .aux file has
| changed. It turns out that this aux file is explicitely not tracked:
|
| // (2) foundfile is in the tmpdir
| // insert it into head
| if (fs::exists(onlyfile)) {
| static regex unwanted("^.*\\.(aux|log|dvi|bbl|ind|glo)$");
| if (regex_match(onlyfile, unwanted)) {
| lyxerr[Debug::DEPEND]
| << "We don't want "
| << onlyfile
| << " in the dep file"
| << endl;
|
| Is there a reason for doing this? Is it a remnant from the time when
| we compared modification times only?
|
| Now that we have CRC, looking for updated aux file seems to be the
| best way to see whether LaTeX should be re-run.
|
| Am I missing something?
I cannot really remember why it ended up like it is now, but I suspect
that there is some issues with the .aux file.
I though latex gave a message that thre is unresolved citations? We
should trigger on that and do another latex run.
gives an endless loop when the \cite{foo} points to a _non existing_
bibtex entry
Herbert
