>>>>> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I tested Bo's patch and can tell that in this case they see a >> dialog informing them that a default viewer for postscript is not >> available. So they know that they have to do something... Bo> Many thanks!. Finally someone seems to understand my viewer/core Bo> separation idea. Viewers are not essential part of lyx, and should Bo> be removed from the bundle. I do understand your idea. It does not mean I agree with it. Maybe people do not want/need a postscript viewer (pdflatex/acroread is OK, isn't it?). Let's take another example: you use word and see an option 'Save as OpenDocument'. You select it, and windows tells you "ha, I do not have this one, but if you tell me where the translator is maybe I will be able to set it up". Name the word processors which do that! Also, in windows explorer, can you do "File>New>Openoffice document" when OpenOffice is not installed? Nope. It seems to me good practice to show the capabilities that your installation actually has. I do not see what examples you have in windows of features that are not available but the user can not guess this before trying (and cannot get rid of menu entries even though they are just noise). JMarc
